Free consultation · No fee unless we winEspañolՀայերենFree consultation →

What If I Fell in a Parking Lot at Night?

A fall in a parking lot at night is a claim when inadequate lighting combined with a hazard the owner should have fixed, such as a wheel stop, pothole, or unmarked curb. The lighting and the hazard have to be documented within days, before they change.

A fall in a parking lot at night can be a claim against whoever owns, manages or maintains the lot, if poor lighting hid a hazard that a reasonable owner would have fixed or marked. Lighting is the issue that makes nighttime falls different. A wheel stop you’d step over in daylight becomes a tripping hazard when the pole light above it is burned out. A pothole near the cart return at a Ralphs on Devonshire is a claim at 9 p.m. in a way it might not be at noon. The owner has a duty to keep the lot reasonably safe, and that includes lighting it so the hazards it contains can be seen.

What decides these cases is documentation of the lighting and the hazard within days of the fall, because both change. Burned out lamps get replaced the week after an incident report. Potholes get patched. Wheel stops get painted yellow. Six months later, when the adjuster sends a photo of a well lit lot with fresh paint, the claim has to prove what the lot looked like on the night in question, and the only way to do that is photographs taken at the same hour within days, ideally with a light meter reading, plus a measurement of the hazard. A wheel stop that sits two inches above grade in an unmarked space, in an area where the nearest working light was sixty feet away, is a documented hazard. “It was dark and I tripped on something” is not.

Can I sue if I fell in a parking lot at night?

Yes, when the fall was caused by a hazard the property owner or manager should have fixed or marked and inadequate lighting kept you from seeing it. California property owners owe reasonable care to people using their lots, including maintaining lighting and surfaces. The claim depends on proving the hazard, the lighting conditions that night, and that the owner knew or should have known about both, which requires photographs and measurements taken within days.

How parking lot liability works in California

A parking lot usually has more than one responsible party. The land may be owned by an investor, leased to a shopping center operator, managed by a property management company, and maintained by a sweeping or lighting contractor. The store you were visiting, whether a Costco in Burbank or a strip mall on Sherman Way, may have lease obligations for its portion of the lot. All of them are identified and put on notice, because each has a separate policy and a separate argument that someone else was responsible.

Two doctrines come up constantly. The first is the trivial defect rule: a very small height difference, around three quarters of an inch to an inch with nothing else wrong, is generally not a basis for liability by itself. Darkness changes that analysis. Courts look at aggravating circumstances, and poor lighting, shadows, an unmarked edge, and debris all count. A one inch lip in a dark lot is not the same as a one inch lip at noon. The second is notice: the owner has to have known or should have known about the hazard. A pole light that’s been out for weeks, a pothole that has been there long enough to collect gravel, a wheel stop that’s been unpainted since the lot was striped, all show constructive notice.

If the lot belongs to a public entity, a city lot in Glendale, a Metro park and ride, a county building, the claim is against the government and a written claim must be filed within six months under Government Code 911.2. Missing that deadline ends the claim.

What the insurance company will argue

The owner’s insurer will say the hazard was open and obvious, that you’d parked there before, that you were looking at your phone or carrying bags, and that the lighting met code. They’ll produce a maintenance log showing the lot was inspected weekly, and a photo of the lot taken after the repairs. They’ll add that you were wearing sandals, or that you’d had a drink with dinner.

Pure comparative negligence applies, so even where some of this sticks, it reduces the claim rather than ending it. A Chatsworth client fell over a wheel stop in an unpainted space at the far end of a shopping center lot at about 8:30 on a winter evening, fracturing her kneecap. The nearest pole light was out. Photos taken two nights later, before anyone fixed anything, showed the dark corner and the gray concrete stop against gray asphalt. The management company’s own work order system, obtained after the claim was filed, showed the light had been reported out three weeks before her fall and not repaired. Notice, hazard and lighting were all in the file. The comparative fault argument about her shoes went nowhere.

What to do now

Go back to the lot, at the same time of night, within a day or two, and photograph the area where you fell, the hazard itself with something for scale, the nearest lights and whether they’re working, and the general view a person walking from the store to a car would have had. Video on a phone, walking the path, is useful. If the hazard is a height difference, measure it. If you can, note the position of the working lights relative to where you fell.

Report the fall to the store or the management office and ask for an incident report. Request in writing that any surveillance video covering the lot be preserved; most systems overwrite in a week to a month. Get medical care and tell the provider it was a fall in a dark parking lot and what you tripped on. Keep the shoes you wore. Find out who owns and manages the lot, which an attorney can do from the county records and the signage.

Common mistakes

Waiting a week to go back is the main one, because the light may be fixed by then. Reporting “I fell in the parking lot” without identifying the hazard is the second; the owner will say there was nothing there. Posting about it is the third. Giving a recorded statement to the owner’s insurer that includes “I wasn’t really paying attention” is the fourth. Assuming a fall on a city or county lot works the same as a private one is the fifth, because the six month deadline is unforgiving.

Questions people ask next

Who is responsible for a fall in a store parking lot? Often several parties: the owner, the management company, the maintenance contractor, and sometimes the store under its lease. All are identified and notified.

Is a parking lot required to have lighting? Building codes set minimums for new construction, and regardless of code the owner must keep the lot reasonably safe, which includes lighting that lets people see hazards.

What if I tripped on a wheel stop? Wheel stops are a common basis for claims when they’re unpainted, misplaced, broken, or in a walkway, especially in poor light.

Manoukian Law Firm handles falls on unsafe property across the San Fernando Valley and Los Angeles County, and Vaheh Manoukian personally sees to the early documentation that these cases depend on. If you fell in a parking lot at night, call (818) 818-5031 for a free consultation, and do it before the lot changes.

Last reviewed by Vaheh Manoukian, Esq., founding attorney, Manoukian Law Firm.

Client reviews

What clients say

★★★★★

Great lawyer. Kept me informed every step of the way. I would definitely recommend this law office to everyone I know.

Eric T. · Google review
★★★★★

It was a huge blessing because he listened to me and gave me updates throughout the case. He was so helpful in making sure that everything went smoothly. My daughter and I are so thankful that he took our case and worked with us on achieving a favorable outcome.

Raquel F. · Google review
★★★★★

Manoukian Law Firm was professional and responsive throughout my case. They kept me informed and helped me reach a settlement.

Wali A. · Google review
★★★★★

As a retired attorney, I feel qualified to evaluate Mr. Manoukian's representation of me in an injury law suit. Mr. Manoukian was responsive to all of my communications; he was an excellent draftsman in all correspondence and pleadings; he analyzed the matter precisely; he demonstrated great knowledge of the issues; he was a delight to work with; and he did an excellent job in preparing me for my deposition.

Saul L., retired attorney · Google review

Reviews are from Google and are reproduced as written. Every case is different, and results vary.

Read more reviews →

Free consultation

Start with a free consultation.

Confidential and free, with no obligation. Tell us what happened, and an attorney calls you back the same business day.

(818) 818-5031

Tell us what happened.

Free and confidential. An attorney calls you back the same business day.

or
Pick a time for a call back By submitting you agree to be contacted about your case by phone, text or email. Message and data rates may apply. Reply STOP to opt out. See our Privacy Policy and Terms. Protected by reCAPTCHA. The Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.