Free consultation · No fee unless we winEspañolՀայերենFree consultation →

Burned by Laser Hair Removal at an Encino or Sherman Oaks Med Spa?

A cosmetic laser is a medical device in California, and who was holding it decides your deadline, the damages cap and whether the consent form means anything. Here is how a med spa burn claim is built.

A clean, empty treatment room with a reclining chair and soft lighting

If a laser or IPL treatment at a med spa left you with a burn, a scar or dark patches that did not fade, you likely have a claim, and two questions decide almost everything about it: who was holding the handpiece, and who owned the business. In California a cosmetic laser is a prescriptive medical device and using one is the practice of medicine. Only a physician, or a registered nurse or physician assistant working under a physician’s supervision, may fire it. An esthetician, a cosmetologist, a medical assistant or a licensed vocational nurse may not, under any circumstances, according to the Medical Board of California.

Those two answers set the deadline for your claim, decide whether a cap on damages applies, and often decide whether the consent form you signed means anything.

A laser is a medical device, and California treats it that way

The Medical Board’s position is blunt. Its guidance says medical spas “are marketing vehicles for medical procedures,” that a business offering them “must be owned by physicians,” and that whatever the sign says, “it is the practice of medicine.” On who may use lasers or intense pulsed light devices, the Board lists physicians, and physician assistants and registered nurses under a physician’s supervision, then adds: “Unlicensed medical assistants, licensed vocational nurses, cosmetologists, electrologists, or estheticians may not legally perform these treatments under any circumstances.” The physician need not be on site but must be immediately reachable.

Cosmetology law agrees. Business and Professions Code 7316 lets an esthetician remove hair by tweezers, waxing, sugaring and depilatories, “except by the use of lasers or light waves, which are commonly known as rays,” and Business and Professions Code 7320 says a cosmetology license “confers no authority to practice medicine or surgery.”

Before a prescriptive drug or device is used, the Medical Board requires what the statute calls an “appropriate prior examination” and the industry calls a good faith exam. Business and Professions Code 2242 makes furnishing a dangerous drug without one unprofessional conduct, the Board’s guidance extends the same requirement to prescriptive devices such as lasers, and the Board says the physician may not delegate the examination to a registered nurse. If no physician, or nurse practitioner under standardized procedures, evaluated your skin type, medications and recent sun exposure before the first pulse, that omission is part of the claim. The American Academy of Dermatology notes that laser hair removal “must be performed very carefully” on darker skin and that burns, permanent color changes and scars “can occur” in inexperienced hands.

Who held the handpiece, and who owned the business

If the person who treated you was a physician, a registered nurse or a physician assistant acting within their license, the claim is one for professional negligence, and the set of laws known as MICRA applies. If the person was an esthetician, a medical assistant or someone with no license at all, the claim against that person and the business that employed them is ordinary negligence. Business and Professions Code 2052 makes unlicensed practice of medicine a public offense, extends it to anyone who “aids or abets,” and preserves “any other remedy provided by law,” which keeps the civil claim open.

Ownership matters for a related reason. Business and Professions Code 2400 says corporations “shall have no professional rights, privileges, or powers,” and the Medical Board lists among prohibited arrangements a spa offering laser hair removal “that contracts with or hires a physician as its ‘medical director’” when the physician does not own the practice; such a business “must be a physician-owned medical practice” with a physician as majority shareholder. A lay-owned clinic with a physician’s name on the wall does not make the physician disappear as a defendant. It adds the owner as another one.

We find out by asking. A written request for your treatment record should produce the names of the operator and the supervising physician, the license search at search.dca.ca.gov confirms what license each holds, and Secretary of State filings show who owns the entity.

Two clocks: one year or two

For professional negligence by a “health care provider,” Code of Civil Procedure 340.5 gives one year from the date you discovered, or reasonably should have discovered, the injury, and never more than three years from the injury itself, with narrow exceptions for fraud, intentional concealment or a foreign object left in the body. A laser burn usually shows itself within days, so in practice the deadline is one year from the treatment. A health care provider under that statute includes any person licensed under Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code, which covers physicians, registered nurses, nurse practitioners and physician assistants.

Everyone else gets two years under Code of Civil Procedure 335.1. Cosmetologists and estheticians are licensed under Division 3, so they are not MICRA health care providers. A medical assistant is unlicensed. A lay-owned spa is a business, not a provider. The statute also limits professional negligence to services “within the scope of services for which the provider is licensed and which are not within any restriction imposed by the licensing agency.” Whether a registered nurse who fired a laser with no supervising physician was acting within a licensing restriction, and therefore outside MICRA, is a live argument. There is no published California appellate decision on it, so it is argument rather than settled law.

Assume the shorter clock until the operator’s license is confirmed. Our guide to the California personal injury statute of limitations covers the general rules. A med spa injury is the case where the general rule can be a year too generous.

The AB 35 cap and why the defendant matters

MICRA also caps noneconomic damages, the compensation for pain, disfigurement and the effect of a scar on your life. Under Civil Code 3333.2, as amended by AB 35 in 2022, the cap for an injury case not involving a death is $470,000 in 2026 for each of up to three categories of defendant: health care providers, health care institutions, and unaffiliated providers or institutions. The figure rises by $40,000 each January 1 through 2033, so it will be $510,000 in 2027. Economic damages, meaning medical bills, corrective treatment and lost earnings, are not capped, and a single physician defendant is limited to one category.

A claim in ordinary negligence has no cap at all. A permanent facial scar caused by an esthetician at a lay-owned clinic is valued by a jury without a statutory ceiling. The same scar caused by a supervised registered nurse in a physician-owned practice is a MICRA claim.

The 90-day notice

If a licensed provider is a defendant, Code of Civil Procedure 364 requires at least 90 days’ written notice of intent to sue before the complaint is filed. No particular form is required, but the notice must state the legal basis of the claim and describe the injuries with specificity. Served within the last 90 days of the limitations period, it extends the deadline 90 days from service.

The consent form you signed

Every med spa hands you a consent and release before treatment. Its legal effect is limited. Civil Code 1668 says any contract that tries to exempt a party from responsibility for “fraud, or willful injury to the person or property of another, or violation of law, whether willful or negligent” is against public policy. In Tunkl v. Regents of the University of California (1963), the California Supreme Court held a hospital’s release for its own negligence unenforceable because medical care affects the public interest: a regulated business, a service of importance to the public, a standardized form the customer cannot negotiate, and a customer who places her body under the seller’s control. A med spa laser treatment arguably fits every item on that list. Where the treatment itself violated the law, as it does when an esthetician operates a laser, Civil Code 1668 bars the release on its own terms, and published decisions also suggest a release for future gross negligence is unenforceable.

A consent form does one legitimate thing: it records that you were told about known risks like blistering and pigment change. It does not record that the operator was licensed, that a physician examined you, or that the settings were right for your skin.

What to do this week

The injury is the evidence, and it changes daily.

  1. Photograph the burn every day, in the same light, with a coin in the frame for scale. Darkening or lightening of the skin often appears weeks after the redness fades, so keep going for months.
  2. See a dermatologist within days. The FDA lists “pain, infection, bleeding, scarring, and skin color changes” among the risks of cosmetic lasers, and a dermatologist’s chart dating the burn to the treatment is the causation proof. For a serious burn, UCLA West Valley Medical Center in West Hills houses a regional burn center.
  3. Request your complete file from the spa in writing: intake forms, the consent, the treatment log with device settings, and the names and license numbers of the operator and supervising physician.
  4. Look up every name at search.dca.ca.gov and keep screenshots.
  5. File a complaint with the Medical Board of California, whose consumer line is (800) 633-2322 and whose complaint categories include unlicensed activity and quality of care. If a cosmetologist or esthetician was involved, file a second one with the Board of Barbering and Cosmetology through breeze.ca.gov, with photographs, medical records and the receipt. Board investigations produce records and admissions that become evidence in the civil case.
  6. Keep every receipt and message with the spa, do not post about the injury, and talk to a lawyer before signing anything further.

What the litigation studies show

A 2014 study in JAMA Dermatology, led by a researcher at UCLA’s Division of Dermatology, reviewed 175 laser injury lawsuits from 1999 to 2012 and found that 42.9 percent involved a nonphysician operator, that the share rose from 36.3 percent to 77.8 percent between 2008 and 2011, and that laser hair removal was the most commonly litigated procedure. For hair removal alone, 75.5 percent of lawsuits from 2004 to 2012 involved nonphysician operators, rising to 85.7 percent for 2008 to 2012, and 64 percent of nonphysician cases took place outside a traditional medical setting. A follow-up study covering 2012 to 2020 found 71 percent of 69 claims involved a nonphysician operator.

Where the clinics are

Ventura Boulevard through Encino, Sherman Oaks and Studio City is the Valley’s corridor of aesthetics clinics, and Calabasas has its own cluster of them. Manoukian Law Firm handles injury cases throughout California from its Chatsworth office. Our pages for Encino, Sherman Oaks and Studio City cover the local courts and hospitals, and the types of cases we handle and how the firm works are described elsewhere on the site.

Key points

  • A cosmetic laser or IPL device may be operated only by a physician, or by a registered nurse or physician assistant under physician supervision; estheticians and medical assistants may not use one.
  • The operator’s license decides the deadline: one year from discovery under Code of Civil Procedure 340.5 for a licensed provider, two years under 335.1 for an unlicensed operator or a non-medical business.
  • MICRA caps noneconomic damages at $470,000 per category in 2026; an ordinary negligence claim has no cap.
  • A signed consent or release does not excuse negligence in a medical procedure under Civil Code 1668 and Tunkl, and never excuses a violation of law.
  • Photograph the burn daily, see a dermatologist, request the treatment record, and file Medical Board and Barbering and Cosmetology Board complaints.
  • Published studies show most laser hair removal lawsuits involve a nonphysician operator.

Frequently asked questions

The spa says a nurse did my treatment. Does that end the ordinary negligence claim?

Not by itself. The nurse’s license has to be confirmed, a supervising physician has to have performed the appropriate prior examination, and the business has to be physician-owned. If any of those is missing, there is an argument that the treatment fell outside MICRA, and the owner is a defendant regardless.

I signed a waiver. Can I still bring a claim?

Usually yes. A release for a provider’s own negligence in a medical procedure is vulnerable under Tunkl, and Civil Code 1668 voids any release for a violation of law, which includes an unlicensed person operating a laser.

The burn is on my leg and will probably fade. Is it still a case?

It can be. Pigment changes after a laser burn sometimes last for years, and a dermatologist rather than the spa should predict how it will heal. Daily photographs and a dermatology chart let the claim be valued on what happened.

Should I let the spa “fix” the burn for free?

Get an independent dermatologist’s opinion first. Free follow-up visits are sometimes paired with a request to sign a further release. Keep the offer in writing.

If a laser or IPL treatment left you burned, scarred or discolored, call Manoukian Law Firm at (818) 818-5031 or reach us through our contact page. Consultations are free and there is no fee unless we recover for you.

Last reviewed by Vaheh Manoukian, Esq., founding attorney, Manoukian Law Firm.

Client reviews

What clients say

★★★★★

Great lawyer. Kept me informed every step of the way. I would definitely recommend this law office to everyone I know.

Eric T. · Google review
★★★★★

It was a huge blessing because he listened to me and gave me updates throughout the case. He was so helpful in making sure that everything went smoothly. My daughter and I are so thankful that he took our case and worked with us on achieving a favorable outcome.

Raquel F. · Google review
★★★★★

Manoukian Law Firm was professional and responsive throughout my case. They kept me informed and helped me reach a settlement.

Wali A. · Google review
★★★★★

As a retired attorney, I feel qualified to evaluate Mr. Manoukian's representation of me in an injury law suit. Mr. Manoukian was responsive to all of my communications; he was an excellent draftsman in all correspondence and pleadings; he analyzed the matter precisely; he demonstrated great knowledge of the issues; he was a delight to work with; and he did an excellent job in preparing me for my deposition.

Saul L., retired attorney · Google review

Reviews are from Google and are reproduced as written. Every case is different, and results vary.

Read more reviews →

Free consultation

Start with a free consultation.

Confidential and free, with no obligation. Tell us what happened, and an attorney calls you back.

(818) 818-5031

Tell us what happened.

Free and confidential. An attorney calls you back.

or
Pick a time for a call back By submitting you agree to be contacted about your case by phone, text or email. Message and data rates may apply. Reply STOP to opt out. See our Privacy Policy and Terms. Protected by reCAPTCHA. The Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.